Posts

@Nocturn
Yeah that was my thoughts too, anatomically incorrect just doesn’t feel right—especially in the context of AI artwork where it takes on an whole different meaning. XD

Examples of why simply looking for images that have crotchboobs don’t work:

If I’m looking for Twilight Sparkle I want to be able to find: [things where you can’t see crotchboobs but you can either safely assume they exist OR they don’t need to be there because we’re talking about human twilight or gender swapped twilight.]
https://tantabus.ai/images/44763?q=my%3Afaves%2C+twilight+sparkle
https://tantabus.ai/images/45211?q=my%3Afaves%2C+twilight+sparkle
https://tantabus.ai/images/45651?q=my%3Afaves%2C+twilight+sparkle
https://tantabus.ai/images/44091?q=my%3Afaves%2C+twilight+sparkle
https://tantabus.ai/images/38068?q=my%3Afaves%2C+twilight+sparkle
https://tantabus.ai/images/38272?q=my%3Afaves%2C+twilight+sparkle

And even things like this: [showlistic plot where there are no sexualizaion/sexual organs on display anyway, you can safely just put this under the mental category of all equipment is there just censored.]
https://tantabus.ai/images/51731?q=twilight+sparkle%2C+safe
https://tantabus.ai/images/41719?q=twilight+sparkle%2C+safe%2C+plot
https://tantabus.ai/images/22202?q=twilight+sparkle%2C+safe%2C+plot

What I want to filter out are images like these: [images clearly depicting mastectomy]
https://tantabus.ai/images/51534?q=twilight+sparkle%2C+explicit
https://tantabus.ai/images/50712?q=twilight+sparkle%2C+explicit

Please do not use that tag for characters that are, technically speaking, “on book” for the show. I think it’s wrong to have one group tagging things as anatomically incorrect if they don’t match IRL horses, and another tagging things as anatomically incorrect if they look like they do in the show. Makes the tag utterly useless because it’s meaning becomes simply “Me No Like This!”

@CCDrop
Can you please provide an example of an image that you want to find, but that does not have crotchboobs, so I can see what is preventing -crotchboobs from doing what you want?

@FrostRU
done

https://tantabus.ai/tags/countess+coloratura should imply https://tantabus.ai/tags/coloratura

@Background Pony #635A
done

And lying on a cloud should imply on a cloud.

Glory (g5) should be marked as a canon character.

@Zerowinger
done.

I don’t want things with just crotchboobs though that misses the point. Since any position where you can’t naturally see them it’s not an issue. Since it’s not the absence of crotchboobs that’s the issue per se it’s the absence of them when they should be there. Since really a proper tag for this would probably be mastectomy since that’s why it’s so off putting is it’s like looking a castration or penectomy image since there’s a natural structure that should be there that’s not.

So for example I wouldn’t want to have to search balls just because I don’t want to see castration I just don’t want to see castration so I hide castration and that’s what I want here. I don’t care if I see crotchboobs I just don’t want to see mastectomy or whatever tag makes the most sense to start using.

@CCDrop
Generally, tagging an absence of something isn’t needed because you can search with negation. Searching for -crotchboobs would search for anything without crotchboobs. Exceptions are made, but they are just that: exceptions.

https://tantabus.ai/tags/evergreen
https://tantabus.ai/tags/hard+hat+%28g4%29

Both should be character tags.

Please alias on cloud into on a cloud.

@someguy845
done

So one thing I’ve always wished I could filter by, but there’s no tag for it is crotchboobless for images where you can clearly see the crotch on a feral pony and there’s no boobs. I don’t care if there’s human vulva on pony which is where 80% of these kinds of images come from just as long as the boobs are present in the correct place.

So I was wondering what’s the policy for new tags and would it be alright if I started tagging things as crotchboobless or something more politically correct?

I feel like on a politically correct side it would be to start tagging them all as anatomically incorrect but also looking at the content of that tag… I feel like it would be too harsh even if technically true, since I feel like the anatomically incorrect tag is a good general filter tag to avoid truly messed up anatomy, where as really crotchbooblessness is just kind of its own unique fetish.

Added the ship:pinkiesentry tag. According to Derpibooru, it implies:

female, g4, male, pinkie pie, shipping, straight, flash sentry

@tyto4tme4l
done.

“Questionable consent” and “dubcon” should be aliased to “dubious consent”.

https://tantabus.ai/tags/questionable+consent
https://tantabus.ai/tags/dubious+consent

@someguy845
Done.

According to Derpi, “babydoll” should imply clothes, nightgown, and lingerie. Description provided by Derpi is a “bra-like garment with a long, usually sheer, flounce.”

All done.

“Grayscale” should imply “monochrome”. Also, it should have an alias “greyscale”.

https://tantabus.ai/tags/grayscale
https://tantabus.ai/tags/monochrome

“Full moon” should imply “moon.”

@Zerowinger
It’s fixed now.

Should be a character tag.

Done

Should imply “Catrina” and “breasts”