Posts

…

@Heat Sink
Oh, and in 4 month, only a dozen people answered? Rough…

Oh, great for the tags. Well, maybe check an append “AI Composition” or one of the other if none are present when converting “Prompter:” to “Creator:”.
Else, you will lose an important information about the art. Imho.

Also, thanks for the quick answer.

That forum post 9 months ago also had a banner when it was posted and people had 4 months the time to give there opinion on it.

There already exists such a tag, multiple to be exact.

You have AI Generated, AI Composition & AI Assisted

You know, AI changed a LOT these 9 last months.
You may want to run the pool again, probably by putting a banner in the top for a week or two.
Because you are going to take a decision taken by basically a dozen people 9 months ago.
I can only speak for myself, and I have nothing against AI art, but would find it more fair to keep a tag like “AI” if you merge “prompter” and “creator”.
Like “Prompter:(username)” become “Creator:(username)”+“AI_used” and “Artist:(Username)” become “Creator:(Username)”.
It would be fairer while uniting the artist with only one “Creator” tag. (I don’t see what was bad about artist tho).
Just my two cents.

My name is Prompter, I like ponies.

Wish I took part in it…

No, here is a link to the forum post where i counted all of the votes from both community and staff. Keeping it seperate had the lowest amount of votes.

I’m afraid so…

So wait… people voted for keeping the Creator tag separate, but now it’s not going to be separate anyway?

Exactly…!

Seems like semantics to me, but I’m fine with it.

Okay then…

Hello Everypony (and other creatures),

Around 9 months ago we asked the community about a possible change in the creator tags. Out of a poll that consisted out of both the community and the staff it turned out that a majority was for combining the “Prompter” & “Artist” tags into one unified tag while leaving the creator tag seperate.
Four months ago i came back and asked both the community and Staff what the new name would be for this combined tag, A majority of both the Comunnity and the staff voted for the name “Creator:”
So now is the time to implement this new tag.

On 21st of June this change will be implemented, this means that all the tags that have “Prompter:(username)” & “Artist:(Username)” will be changed into “Creator:(Username)”
The “Editor:(Username)” will remain for images that are edits of another creator’s AI image.

If there are any further questions about this change i am happy to answer them to the best of my ability.

Thank you! I found this advice helpful and am using it.

(This was a mispost, a reply-to wrong message, and I tried to erase it. Corrected post below.)

you can upload the earlier stuff here
old jank ai stuff is allowed to be jankier than newer stuff
just tag it with generation errors

Update: I THINK I have one cautious ‘solution’ that could work…

That is…if some of my cover images are ‘good enough quality for this site,’ (like this one https://tantabus.ai/images/75251) and some of the images are not so good quality, representing rather primitive and imperfect generative AI output…

I guess I can post the good ones indvidually, and to represent THE ENTIRE SET of the cover images I can make a single collage of all of them, maybe with the good images bigger?

I still appreciate any advice, though.

Thanks!

So, I have stories on fimfiction.net, about ten or twelve of which have generative AI cover images. For most of those images, I prompted the generative AIs myself and did any cleanup myself. The exception is an image that a friend used AI to make.

I might replace the stories’ cover images, and I am interested in archiving copies of the (old/replaced) cover images HERE.

IS this considered an (in)appropriate use of this site? Some of these ten or twelve images DO show signs of having been made with, shall we say, ‘past generations of generative technology.’ SOME OTHER images look good, imho.

Maybe the prettiest image, imho, is the cover image on (please forgive me for linking to the story) https://www.fimfiction.net/story/562268/fight-to-the-fin-ish-ultimate-extreme-paternity-battle-with-magic
I truly feel bad about deleting that one, because imho it’s an interesting example of what past versions of Pony Diffusion have been able to do.

I could link to more examples, but I don’t know how much linking I can do before maybe someone complains. I am very new to this site! I am only creating an account so I can refer people to here to see the old cover images (images which at least a few people seemed to enjoy.)

So…is this probably ok? Do you need more information? Should I expect some of the images to be deleted? ;_;

Anyway, thank you for any useful information and advice you can share!

I throw this in the ring:

Older but remarkable:

@Background Pony #A06F & @Background Pony #EB0A & @Background Pony #EB0A & @Background Pony #EB0A

Please see my reply to your other posts about this.

@BigBuggyBastage
Do they have GMail or no?

@Background Pony #EB0A
Read the Contact page. Best bet is their Discord server.

@Scarlet Ribbon
Oh okay, so what I must I do about the e-mail then?

@Background Pony #EB0A
Philomena is the underlying software Derpibooru and Tantabus run on.