General "Whoa this tag is missing stuff!" Thread

“Holding object” should probably be aliased to “holding”.

https://tantabus.ai/tags/holding+object
https://tantabus.ai/tags/holding

Only made it imply coco pommel as it does on Derpi.

@Bendy and Boney
Then what will happen to alias requests? Will a mod go through this thread to work only on alias requests or should we save them for until you can handle aliases?

@tyto4tme4l
Derpi also has holding something and so do we: holding something.

Huh, why not the anal slut one?

Mystery Mint should have a character tag and should imply g4.

Merge eye shadow and eyeshadow

Nipple ring dress should imply nipples, nipple rings, breasts, and dress

@Background Pony #356F
Matched the implications with Derpi.

@someguy845
Done.

I changed my username. Can I get creator:iwtcipp aliased to creator:pipette poster?

@Pipette Poster
I still can bug other more senior staff into aliasing tags, especially if it’s just a single one.

I’ll try right now.

Edit: Done.

@Bendy and Boney
Thanks!

How about merging high angle and from above? I don’t think there’s a difference.

Pls merge creator:ilager and creator:lager_ai

@Background Pony #356F - Done.

@Background Pony #356F - There’s a bunch of camera angles, maybe they should be handled more as a group. Could you please open a new thread in the tagging discussion forum? I will when I get more time but right now I’m kind of swamped with other things.

@Pipette Poster - Set up your creator link.

@Background Pony #356F - done, also added the implication makeup to all the images that were missing it.

I’ll look through this thread more when I get caught up with some other stuff. In the meantime, if you are waiting for an alias, particularly for creator tags, please ask again and I’ll treat it as a priority.

Also, the more detail you put into why one tag should be aliased into another tag will help - don’t assume I or anyone else on staff knows which character is also which other character in a show other than MLP.

I did update both the Rarity and Twilight versions to imply the character. However, I also didn’t add the anal slut as an implication.

Looking at the use of that tag, it seems to keep getting added to images that don’t show anal, so even adding the implication anal is not a great idea.

Also, while Coco Pommel is an anal slut is a funny and friendly community tag, like shining armor is a goddamn moron, implying slut or anal slut, or even adding those to the same images, is different by many degrees.

It’s like having the Shining Armor tag imply goddamn moron or moron. An image qualifying for shining armor is a goddamned moron doesn’t mean he’s really being a moron or that the image is worth vulgarity. Sometimes he’s just being his adorkable self. In the same way, Coco Pommel may be getting all hot and bothered and putting a hoof over her butt simply because of the mere presence of anal toys (or suggestively shaped vegetables) sitting on a shelf, so the coco is an anal slut tag would be appropriate, but implying anal slut is not, any more than anal would be.

Also, the slut tag in and of itself is much more derogatory, and is something that often ends up causing some tag warring, like the tag whore, which some people use too subjectively because of their own hangups about fetishes. So, personally, I am not a fan of adding those implications.

Neat, thanks!