I still don’t know why Derpi didn’t automate their two image limit. Website should stop someone from submitting third AI image instead of having admins delete excessive images after the fact.
Because some people make it so other people can’t have nice things. Quick circumvent just because I could see some people being petty about it: not adding the AI tag (doesn’t require any artist tag on upload, and could still put
artist needed as placeholder), and placing the relevant tag after the fact. Quick way to juke it. Why someone would do this? Fuck knows. But I wouldn’t be surprised if someone did already.It could even queue the image to be auto-submitted later to stop people from circumventing the limit by omitting the AI tag (assuming that would even be a semi-common problem).
A system that doesn’t exist yet that would have to e built from the ground up to work with the site is more work than just spinning up another site, I’d guess. Also relieves the [apparent] main site workload to work on the other non-AI content reports.
A ghost signature removal is a 5 minute job with the clone/patch tool in GIMP
(Or Krita)
@Background Pony #0B6C
I won’t lie: I’d rather there still be more AI porn content rather than barring it. The more overall content, the merrier.
I won’t lie: I’d rather there still be more AI porn content rather than barring it. The more overall content, the merrier.