Since “ai composition” is a thing now, tags like “generator:zoinksnoob” should not imply “ai generated” IMO.
BTW: I feel like this “generator” term is pretty vague, I would prefer something like “model” or “checkpoint” instead.
"Generator:" tags should not imply "ai generated"
@tyto4tme4l
This is already how a lot of people are using it, and I agree that checkpoint would be a better term, but I also imagine a lot of other people prefer not to let on to exactly what checkpoints they’re using, so having a generic catch-all is probably better in a lot of cases.
This is already how a lot of people are using it, and I agree that checkpoint would be a better term, but I also imagine a lot of other people prefer not to let on to exactly what checkpoints they’re using, so having a generic catch-all is probably better in a lot of cases.
I agree with the OP. When first seeing the “generator” tag, I thought it would contain the name of the person, who generated the art. I think a better name would be any of
tool:zoinksnoob, ai:zoinksnoob, but I guess that ship has already sailed Background Pony #1DED
On a related note, should there be a tag something like “process needed” (or “effort level needed”) to flag uploads that lack any of the “ai generated”/“ai assisted” etc. tags?
@Background Pony #1DED
Eh, I think these uploads can be assumed to be “ai generated” and retagged later if necessary.
Eh, I think these uploads can be assumed to be “ai generated” and retagged later if necessary.