@Background Pony #837B
Well she’s cool with using it as reference material, kinda like people were saying artists could do when AI art was starting to pick up popularity.
Unfortunate that most people using it don’t give a fuck about the process of creating art and just want endless streams of the sloppiest content to be pumped out and consumed ad infinitum.
@Background Pony #837B
Ye. Sure wish more people would use it that way, rather than just using the AI to generate the content they post so that they don’t actually have to create anything themselves.
This is a beautiful Fluttershy pic, but I definitely wouldn’t have pegged it as Evehly’s work. Though the source description says that she painted over everything, so that’d make this an AI Reference pic, not AI Assisted, as it was originally tagged.
Tasteful AI content is cool and I 100% agree effortless AI slop “art” sucks, I did say AI art!
Well she’s cool with using it as reference material, kinda like people were saying artists could do when AI art was starting to pick up popularity.
Unfortunate that most people using it don’t give a fuck about the process of creating art and just want endless streams of the sloppiest content to be pumped out and consumed ad infinitum.
Ye. Sure wish more people would use it that way, rather than just using the AI to generate the content they post so that they don’t actually have to create anything themselves.
That’s what I thought, but wanted to ask to make sure.
It means that an AI image was used as reference material for the image, but the image itself was entirely made by human hands.
Though the source description says that she painted over everything, so that’d make this an AI Reference pic, not AI Assisted, as it was originally tagged.