Description

Image imported from Derpibooru.
Original: https://derpibooru.org/images/2961721
Metadata at the time of import:
Field Data
Favorites 177
Upvotes 254
Downvotes 9
Score 245
Comments 3
Uploader Anonymous
Original description below this line

No description provided.

Tags
suggestive6083 ai generated50553 automatically imported33021 derpibooru import33215 generator:purplesmart.ai5036 generator:stable diffusion23534 rarity3189 human11404 g445039 ass2935 butt12495 cutie mark on human73 female49545 head out of frame127 humanized3073 light skin187 nudity28016 solo38833 solo female21559 tail9773 tailed humanization39 the quality of ai art is frightening296 tree3587

Comments

Syntax quick reference: **bold** *italic* ||hide text|| `code` __underline__ ~~strike~~ ^sup^ ~sub~

Detailed syntax guide

Background Pony #75F9
@Background Pony #75F9
It’s quite pointless complaining about it. AI will reach the level of human artists sooner or later. So called “soul”(or rather fine details) won’t be enough to differentiate generated and drawn art at some point

Imported from Derpibooru
Background Pony #75F9
I know it doesn’t matter nearly as much as the crap that AI generated ‘art’ fundamentally is, but it’s just an indication of said soullessness, and worth pointing out:
Her cutie mark only has two gems. Other submissions made by bots have four, or five. They are off set, or not repeated, sometimes smudged. It’s a very minor detail, but it’s a detail the machine can not recognize unless dictated by a person. Art worth consuming, and has any value, even low quality made art, by a person, is infinity better than this algorithmically generated nonsense. It shows the laziness of the whole thing; even someone who picks up a pencil for the first time and makes Rarity, knows what her cutie mark is, and how it’s positioned. That small thing shows how much someone cares about the thing they are making, and this shows how much no one or thing cares.

Imported from Derpibooru