Description

Image imported from Derpibooru.
Original: https://derpibooru.org/images/2961721
Metadata at the time of import:
Field Data
Favorites 177
Upvotes 254
Downvotes 9
Score 245
Comments 3
Uploader Anonymous
Original description below this line

No description provided.

Tags
suggestive6077 ai generated50510 automatically imported33021 derpibooru import33215 generator:purplesmart.ai5036 generator:stable diffusion23523 rarity3184 human11395 g444990 ass2934 butt12487 cutie mark on human73 female49504 head out of frame127 humanized3070 light skin187 nudity27990 solo38797 solo female21542 tail9768 tailed humanization37 the quality of ai art is frightening296 tree3582

Comments

Syntax quick reference: **bold** *italic* ||hide text|| `code` __underline__ ~~strike~~ ^sup^ ~sub~

Detailed syntax guide

Background Pony #75F9
@Background Pony #75F9
It’s quite pointless complaining about it. AI will reach the level of human artists sooner or later. So called “soul”(or rather fine details) won’t be enough to differentiate generated and drawn art at some point

Imported from Derpibooru
Background Pony #75F9
I know it doesn’t matter nearly as much as the crap that AI generated ‘art’ fundamentally is, but it’s just an indication of said soullessness, and worth pointing out:
Her cutie mark only has two gems. Other submissions made by bots have four, or five. They are off set, or not repeated, sometimes smudged. It’s a very minor detail, but it’s a detail the machine can not recognize unless dictated by a person. Art worth consuming, and has any value, even low quality made art, by a person, is infinity better than this algorithmically generated nonsense. It shows the laziness of the whole thing; even someone who picks up a pencil for the first time and makes Rarity, knows what her cutie mark is, and how it’s positioned. That small thing shows how much someone cares about the thing they are making, and this shows how much no one or thing cares.

Imported from Derpibooru